Saturday, October 30, 2010

Copyblogger Weekly Wrap

image of bubble wrap

Two weeks ago in Vegas, I earned a new distinction. While on the stage during a Blogworld Expo keynote, Sonia Simone declared me an expert in something. Something cool. Something I can’t repeat here because this is a PG-13 blog — but if you’re feeling saucy, this video contains the original R-rated phrasing (somewhere in point #4, which starts at 50:33).

I’m going to get shirts made so that everyone will know what I stand for. I’m going to wear my new distinction proudly. Who’s with me?

Now that I have free and authoritative latitude to screw things up, I’m going to start doing it everywhere. Take this introduction to the Weekly Wrap, for instance. I’m writing it last… the summaries below are all done. And I could finish the intro and make it all awesome, or I cou…

Monday:

How to Beat “Invisible Content Syndrome”

If you blog and blog and blog but hear no real response to any of your content — and if you’re relatively certain that you don’t just suck — then the problem may be that your content is invisible. This post tells you how to make it visible, and to let the world see it. (Also, if I could be invisible, I’d spend a lot of time in gym showers. Don’t judge me.)

Read the full post here.

Monday, meanwhile, at stately Wayne Manor:

Join Our StudioPress Affiliate Program and Earn 40% Commissions

Technically, just joining the program won’t earn you 40% commissions. Apparently, you should join and then actually promote Genesis… that’s the earn part, right? But don’t worry, you can read more about how to navigate those persnickety technical details in this post.

Read the full post here.

Tuesday:

Tim Gunn’s Top 5 Tips for More Stylish Content

I’d actually call this “5 classic ways to be awesome on your blog” or something because I distrust fashion and style, but that’s just me. I mean, Lady Gaga’s meat dress is considered a no-no today, but what about when the Flintstones were alive? Worn meat was the height of fashion back then, despite the risk of mauling by predators. But, meat or no meat, this post has some evergreen fashionable ways to spiff up your blog in ways that Joan Rivers won’t mock.

Read the full post here.

Wednesday:

Does Your Site Hold Up to the Window Shopping Test?

This is a really interesting concept that I’ll admit I hadn’t thought of. Lots of sites have glitzy and polished “window displays,” but you need to be sure that what’s inside the store meets the enhanced expectations your window display promises. Is your site great through and through? Or is it like that place where I saw cheap electronics in the window, but inside it was just Ving Rhames sitting under an umbrella reading poetry to a cocker spaniel?

Read the full post here.

Thursday:

How to Put Yourself into an Effortless Writing Zone

Warning: Do not just look at the photo at the top of this post and think meditating will get your stuff written. It’s amazing how many times I’ve made that mistake. No, you need to do some stuff, and this post has three solid steps to getting all Zen so that you can write. And don’t forget bonus step #4: Drink heavily. Wait, did I write that down?

Read the full post here.

Friday:

How to Run a Fearless Small Business

Think Halloween and horror movies are scary? Yeah, they can be, but so can day-to-day life as a business owner. This post is full of hang-on-tight-to-your-security-blanket tips for surviving the horrors of entrepreneurship. (Side note: So does this mean that Taylor was never paid to scare people with a chainsaw?)

Read the full post here.

This week’s cool links:

  • The 7 Harsh Realities of Blogging for Bucks: Because I didn’t do it justice in the intro, this post and video actually does contain a bunch of great lessons. Seven of them, to be precise.
  • Why I Deleted My Foursquare Account: This post creeped me out. If you use Foursquare, at least give this a read before making an informed decision about whether or not you want to keep doing so.
  • Are You Ready for the Best Damn Ride of Your Life?: Logan has become the definitive authority on rock & roll business metaphors, and this post is no exception. Want to wow your customers? Treat them like rock stars.
  • Think online marketing is a closed loop? Meet Thor.: There ARE ways to create an online business that doesn’t teach people how to teach people how to teach people how to make money, and this is one such story. (There’s a bit of narcissism in including this one, but I think it’s important to point out that it’s not one big pyramid scheme.)

About the Author: Johnny B. Truant specializes in selling through stories and would like very much to set you up with a cheap blog or website. (That’s “cheap” as in “inexpensive,” not as in “tawdry.”)


Scribe Makes SEO Simple

Related Articles

All Brands Are Politicians

Obama-kissing-a-baby.jpg(image) Recently I was watching television with my wife, a baseball game if memory serves, when an advertisement caught my eye. It was for a regional restaurant chain (not a national one like Jack in the Box). The ad was pretty standard fare - a call to action (go now!) and a clear value proposition: the amazing amount of tasty-looking food you could have for a bargain price. I can't find the ad online, but there's no dearth of similar spots on television - in fact, their plentitude is why the commercial caught my attention in the first place.

In short, the ad offered pretty much all you could eat pasta, fries, and burgers for something like six bucks. Nearly all the food portrayed was processed, fried, and sourced from factory farms - necessarily so, as it'd simply not be possible to offer such a deal were it not for the economies of scale inherent in the US food economy. It's simple capitalism at work: The chain is taking advantage of our nation’s subsidization of cheap calories to deliver what amounts to an extraordinary bargain to a consumer - all you can eat for less than an hour's minimum wage!

It’s entirely predictable that such an offering would be in market. What’s not predictable, until recently, is how marketing such an offer might backfire in the coming age of marketing transparency and political unrest.

Allow me to try to explain.

As I watched the ad, and considered how many similar ones I see on a regular basis, I got to thinking about who the chain was targeting.

Certainly the chain wasn’t targeting me. I'm one of the so-called elites living in a bubble - I try to eat only organic foods, grown locally or sustainably if possible. I do this because I believe these foods are healthier for me and better for the world. I know I am in the extreme minority when it comes to my food - in the main because I can afford the prices they command. (And sure, I love hitting a burger joint every so often as a treat, but I also know that the act of considering fast food chains a “treat” is a privilege - I don't have to rely on those outlets for my main source of sustenance.)

So no, that television ad was most certainly not targeted to me. I'd actually never even heard of the chain (nor had I seen its restaurants near where I live or travel). In short, that chain was wasting its marketing dollars on me, and most likely on a lot of other folks like me who happen to like watching baseball.

So what audience was that chain trying to reach? Experts in food marketing will tell you that the QSR industry is obsessed with reaching young men (and young men do watch baseball). But as I watched that ad, I started to think about another cohort that would clearly be influenced by the ads.

And that “target?” Intentionally or not (most likely not), it struck me that the advertisement would certainly appeal to our nation's poor, as well as to those in our country who have eating issues, quite often the same folks, from what I read. One in seven people in the US are officially poor (and that bar is pretty damn low - $22K a year or less for a family of four). Nearly one in three are categorized as "obese." And these two trends have become a seedbed for what are becoming the most politically sensitive issues of our generation: healthcare, wealth distribution, and energy policy. (The link between energy policy and food is expanded upon here).

Now, what happens when marketers like the all-you-can-eat chain, who like most marketers are not spending their money efficiently on TV, start buying data-driven audiences over highly efficient digital platforms? When and if we get to the nirvana that Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Microsoft, Blue Kai, Cadreon, and countless others are pushing at the moment - a perfect world of matching marketers dollars to audience data and increased foot traffic in-store - we'll be able to discern quite directly who a marketer is influencing.

And while that restaurant chain’s goal might be to influence young men, what happens if the digital advertising ecosystem proves directly that the folks who are responding are deeply effected by what has become a hot potato national issue around food, energy, and health?

And what happens when digital activists reverse engineer that marketing data, and use it as political fodder for issue-based activism? As far as I am concerned, the question isn’t if this is going to happen, the question is when.

Wait a minute, you might protest (if you are a marketer). What about privacy!! Ah, there’s the rub. Today’s privacy conversation is all about the consumer, about protecting the consumer from obtrusive targeting, and informing that consumer how, when, and why he or she is being targeted.

But that same data, which I agree the consumer has a right to access, can be re-aggregated by intelligent services (or industrious journalists using willing consumer sources), and then interpreted in any number of ways. And don't think it's just anti-corporate lefties and green freaks who will be making noise, in my research for this article, I found tons of articles on Tea Party sites decrying federal food subsidies. In short, the data genie is out of the bottle, not just for consumers, but for marketers as well.

Get ready, marketers, to be judged in the public square on your previously private marketing practices – because within the ecosystem our industry is rapidly building, the data will out.

I’m not picking on the food industry here, rather I’m simply using it as a narrative example. Increasingly, a company’s marketing practices will become transparent to its customers, partners, competitors, and detractors. And how one practices that marketing will be judged in real time, in a political dialog that defines the value of that brand in the world.

This new reality will force brands to develop a point of view on major issues of the day - and that ain't an easy thing for brands to do – at least not at present. I’ve written extensively about how brands must become publishers. I’ve now come to the conclusion that they must also become politicians as well. Brands will have to play to their base, cater to interest groups, and answer for their "votes" - how their marketing dollars are spent.

I'd wager that marketers who get in front of this trend and shows leadership on the big issues will be huge winners. What do you think?


Related Articles

All Brands Are Politicians

Obama-kissing-a-baby.jpg(image) Recently I was watching television with my wife, a baseball game if memory serves, when an advertisement caught my eye. It was for a regional restaurant chain (not a national one like Jack in the Box). The ad was pretty standard fare - a call to action (go now!) and a clear value proposition: the amazing amount of tasty-looking food you could have for a bargain price. I can't find the ad online, but there's no dearth of similar spots on television - in fact, their plentitude is why the commercial caught my attention in the first place.

In short, the ad offered pretty much all you could eat pasta, fries, and burgers for something like six bucks. Nearly all the food portrayed was processed, fried, and sourced from factory farms - necessarily so, as it'd simply not be possible to offer such a deal were it not for the economies of scale inherent in the US food economy. It's simple capitalism at work: The chain is taking advantage of our nation’s subsidization of cheap calories to deliver what amounts to an extraordinary bargain to a consumer - all you can eat for less than an hour's minimum wage!

It’s entirely predictable that such an offering would be in market. What’s not predictable, until recently, is how marketing such an offer might backfire in the coming age of marketing transparency and political unrest.

Allow me to try to explain.

As I watched the ad, and considered how many similar ones I see on a regular basis, I got to thinking about who the chain was targeting.

Certainly the chain wasn’t targeting me. I'm one of the so-called elites living in a bubble - I try to eat only organic foods, grown locally or sustainably if possible. I do this because I believe these foods are healthier for me and better for the world. I know I am in the extreme minority when it comes to my food - in the main because I can afford the prices they command. (And sure, I love hitting a burger joint every so often as a treat, but I also know that the act of considering fast food chains a “treat” is a privilege - I don't have to rely on those outlets for my main source of sustenance.)

So no, that television ad was most certainly not targeted to me. I'd actually never even heard of the chain (nor had I seen its restaurants near where I live or travel). In short, that chain was wasting its marketing dollars on me, and most likely on a lot of other folks like me who happen to like watching baseball.

So what audience was that chain trying to reach? Experts in food marketing will tell you that the QSR industry is obsessed with reaching young men (and young men do watch baseball). But as I watched that ad, I started to think about another cohort that would clearly be influenced by the ads.

And that “target?” Intentionally or not (most likely not), it struck me that the advertisement would certainly appeal to our nation's poor, as well as to those in our country who have eating issues, quite often the same folks, from what I read. One in seven people in the US are officially poor (and that bar is pretty damn low - $22K a year or less for a family of four). Nearly one in three are categorized as "obese." And these two trends have become a seedbed for what are becoming the most politically sensitive issues of our generation: healthcare, wealth distribution, and energy policy. (The link between energy policy and food is expanded upon here).

Now, what happens when marketers like the all-you-can-eat chain, who like most marketers are not spending their money efficiently on TV, start buying data-driven audiences over highly efficient digital platforms? When and if we get to the nirvana that Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Microsoft, Blue Kai, Cadreon, and countless others are pushing at the moment - a perfect world of matching marketers dollars to audience data and increased foot traffic in-store - we'll be able to discern quite directly who a marketer is influencing.

And while that restaurant chain’s goal might be to influence young men, what happens if the digital advertising ecosystem proves directly that the folks who are responding are deeply effected by what has become a hot potato national issue around food, energy, and health?

And what happens when digital activists reverse engineer that marketing data, and use it as political fodder for issue-based activism? As far as I am concerned, the question isn’t if this is going to happen, the question is when.

Wait a minute, you might protest (if you are a marketer). What about privacy!! Ah, there’s the rub. Today’s privacy conversation is all about the consumer, about protecting the consumer from obtrusive targeting, and informing that consumer how, when, and why he or she is being targeted.

But that same data, which I agree the consumer has a right to access, can be re-aggregated by intelligent services (or industrious journalists using willing consumer sources), and then interpreted in any number of ways. And don't think it's just anti-corporate lefties and green freaks who will be making noise, in my research for this article, I found tons of articles on Tea Party sites decrying federal food subsidies. In short, the data genie is out of the bottle, not just for consumers, but for marketers as well.

Get ready, marketers, to be judged in the public square on your previously private marketing practices – because within the ecosystem our industry is rapidly building, the data will out.

I’m not picking on the food industry here, rather I’m simply using it as a narrative example. Increasingly, a company’s marketing practices will become transparent to its customers, partners, competitors, and detractors. And how one practices that marketing will be judged in real time, in a political dialog that defines the value of that brand in the world.

This new reality will force brands to develop a point of view on major issues of the day - and that ain't an easy thing for brands to do – at least not at present. I’ve written extensively about how brands must become publishers. I’ve now come to the conclusion that they must also become politicians as well. Brands will have to play to their base, cater to interest groups, and answer for their "votes" - how their marketing dollars are spent.

I'd wager that marketers who get in front of this trend and shows leadership on the big issues will be huge winners. What do you think?


Related Articles

Friday, October 29, 2010

All Brands Are Politicians

Obama-kissing-a-baby.jpg(image) Recently I was watching television with my wife, a baseball game if memory serves, when an advertisement caught my eye. It was for a regional restaurant chain (not a national one like Jack in the Box). The ad was pretty standard fare - a call to action (go now!) and a clear value proposition: the amazing amount of tasty-looking food you could have for a bargain price. I can't find the ad online, but there's no dearth of similar spots on television - in fact, their plentitude is why the commercial caught my attention in the first place.

In short, the ad offered pretty much all you could eat pasta, fries, and burgers for something like six bucks. Nearly all the food portrayed was processed, fried, and sourced from factory farms - necessarily so, as it'd simply not be possible to offer such a deal were it not for the economies of scale inherent in the US food economy. It's simple capitalism at work: The chain is taking advantage of our nation’s subsidization of cheap calories to deliver what amounts to an extraordinary bargain to a consumer - all you can eat for less than an hour's minimum wage!

It’s entirely predictable that such an offering would be in market. What’s not predictable, until recently, is how marketing such an offer might backfire in the coming age of marketing transparency and political unrest.

Allow me to try to explain.

As I watched the ad, and considered how many similar ones I see on a regular basis, I got to thinking about who the chain was targeting.

Certainly the chain wasn’t targeting me. I'm one of the so-called elites living in a bubble - I try to eat only organic foods, grown locally or sustainably if possible. I do this because I believe these foods are healthier for me and better for the world. I know I am in the extreme minority when it comes to my food - in the main because I can afford the prices they command. (And sure, I love hitting a burger joint every so often as a treat, but I also know that the act of considering fast food chains a “treat” is a privilege - I don't have to rely on those outlets for my main source of sustenance.)

So no, that television ad was most certainly not targeted to me. I'd actually never even heard of the chain (nor had I seen its restaurants near where I live or travel). In short, that chain was wasting its marketing dollars on me, and most likely on a lot of other folks like me who happen to like watching baseball.

So what audience was that chain trying to reach? Experts in food marketing will tell you that the QSR industry is obsessed with reaching young men (and young men do watch baseball). But as I watched that ad, I started to think about another cohort that would clearly be influenced by the ads.

And that “target?” Intentionally or not (most likely not), it struck me that the advertisement would certainly appeal to our nation's poor, as well as to those in our country who have eating issues, quite often the same folks, from what I read. One in seven people in the US are officially poor (and that bar is pretty damn low - $22K a year or less for a family of four). Nearly one in three are categorized as "obese." And these two trends have become a seedbed for what are becoming the most politically sensitive issues of our generation: healthcare, wealth distribution, and energy policy. (The link between energy policy and food is expanded upon here).

Now, what happens when marketers like the all-you-can-eat chain, who like most marketers are not spending their money efficiently on TV, start buying data-driven audiences over highly efficient digital platforms? When and if we get to the nirvana that Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Microsoft, Blue Kai, Cadreon, and countless others are pushing at the moment - a perfect world of matching marketers dollars to audience data and increased foot traffic in-store - we'll be able to discern quite directly who a marketer is influencing.

And while that restaurant chain’s goal might be to influence young men, what happens if the digital advertising ecosystem proves directly that the folks who are responding are deeply effected by what has become a hot potato national issue around food, energy, and health?

And what happens when digital activists reverse engineer that marketing data, and use it as political fodder for issue-based activism? As far as I am concerned, the question isn’t if this is going to happen, the question is when.

Wait a minute, you might protest (if you are a marketer). What about privacy!! Ah, there’s the rub. Today’s privacy conversation is all about the consumer, about protecting the consumer from obtrusive targeting, and informing that consumer how, when, and why he or she is being targeted.

But that same data, which I agree the consumer has a right to access, can be re-aggregated by intelligent services (or industrious journalists using willing consumer sources), and then interpreted in any number of ways. And don't think it's just anti-corporate lefties and green freaks who will be making noise, in my research for this article, I found tons of articles on Tea Party sites decrying federal food subsidies. In short, the data genie is out of the bottle, not just for consumers, but for marketers as well.

Get ready, marketers, to be judged in the public square on your previously private marketing practices – because within the ecosystem our industry is rapidly building, the data will out.

I’m not picking on the food industry here, rather I’m simply using it as a narrative example. Increasingly, a company’s marketing practices will become transparent to its customers, partners, competitors, and detractors. And how one practices that marketing will be judged in real time, in a political dialog that defines the value of that brand in the world.

This new reality will force brands to develop a point of view on major issues of the day - and that ain't an easy thing for brands to do – at least not at present. I’ve written extensively about how brands must become publishers. I’ve now come to the conclusion that they must also become politicians as well. Brands will have to play to their base, cater to interest groups, and answer for their "votes" - how their marketing dollars are spent.

I'd wager that marketers who get in front of this trend and shows leadership on the big issues will be huge winners. What do you think?


Related Articles

A Picture is Worth a Thousand Keywords

With so much content on the web, how are web sites supposed to compete with the billions of page views that are being displayed on a daily basis? It’s all about being creative and displaying relevant advertising to your readers, without making it seem like advertising.

One method that a very popular celebrity and news web site is using to bring in extra revenue, while providing a quality source of content to their readers, is displaying advertising which allows the reader to buy the same style of clothing that other celebrities are wearing. Dailymail.co.uk is the site I’m referring to, and they have a very large readership and following, while updated with new content and celebrity pictures daily.

You can see a demonstration of this advertising method below. On a select amount of photographs displayed on their web site, they have little colored dots (shown below) and a “Get the Look” tab on the top left. If you hover over these images, it will then show the same type of clothing which you can then purchase to replicate the style and outfit. You can click on your desired clothing, then it will send you off to that individual clothing web site.

This service is provided by Pixazza, which has already served nearly 8 billion image views since going live. Pixazza states on their web site “A picture is worth a thousand keywords.”, and that’s an awesome way to explain this type of marketing and display advertising. You can visit their web site for more information and how you can display this same type of advertising on your site.

As mentioned, the new ways of advertising online are becoming quite exciting and it’s companies like these who are thinking outside the traditional banner ads and popups, is who will bring in the next wave of advanced advertising.

Related Articles

Are Google’s Local Moves Part of Their Social Future?

Welcome to the total speculation and conjecture section of Marketing Pilgrim. In other words, I have not read what I am looking at in this post anywhere else (mainly because I haven’t really looked :-) ) and I am just trying to connect dots based on some things that have happened in the recent past regarding Google search, Google local and Google Latitude.

Yesterday, the Google mobile blog reported how their new Place Page updates and improvements were being rolled out to Android users.

Lately, we’ve been working on giving you even better ways to find nearby places with Google Maps for Android, such as the Places icon and rich Place pages. Today, we are launching Google Maps 4.6 with a new design for Place page reviews, more options to filter search results, and a Google Latitude real-time updating option.

The ‘throwaway’ in that statement is the Google Latitude real time updating. You remember Google Latitude right? We have reported on its ‘birth’ and a recent thought on how it might be used. When you look at these updates by Google and the rumblings in the industry of Google’s move into social networking it appears as if these disparate parts could be ‘mashed together’ to make a social media offering that is at least intriguing.

With Google’s Place Pages Google is light years ahead of Facebook in data that has been compiled around actual places where people would be and tell others about their being there. If Facebook is leaning on bing for that information then their efforts will be, how can I say this, lame because bing local is not even remotely close to Google’s offering. Take a look at the new look Place Page with reviews (using review source icons for eye candy and recognition). It looks pretty sharp.

Now add in that Latitude is being highlighted as being ‘improved / updated’ and we are looking at the use of Place Pages to possibly facilitate social interaction. Imagine showing where you are using Google Latitude then tying the pimped out Place Page of the location to the ‘check-in’ so your friends can see reviews of where you are along with getting directions through Google Navigation etc etc. You get the point.

All I am saying here is that with the additional importance being given to the Place Page in the search result it is creating a need for businesses to wake up, verify their Place Page, optimize to the nth degree and then manage it. As this information gets better so does the information to be shared through friends in a social / location based environment.

This makes sense because Google cannot try to put together a Facebook knock off to compete with the social networking giant. They need to be different, they need to create or add value and they need to do something that could be seen as complimentary to the Facebook activity that many are already involved in. They have the pieces in place now and appear to gearing up to make what they do best, which is provide information, drive social interaction by more than just “Hey look at me over here!”

If you are a business and you are thinking that you are in anyway going to be tied to the web moving forward (if you are there is help arrange for closing your business down because that’s where you are heading) this line of thinking merits some attention. Like I said at the start, this is not based on any report anywhere but just the logic of what Google is putting into place (pun intended) and the power it could truly hold in an increasingly social online environment.

Maybe Google could find a sizable niche in the social networking space and not stray from their core competency of data aggregation and then slicing and dicing that data to be used by the commoner. Honestly, it’s the only chance they have in the social networking space because at this point to try to clone another model would only create another Google Wave, Google Buzz type flop which they can ill afford to have when talking about their future on the social web.

Your thoughts?

Related Articles

Foursquare’s Crowley Gets Undeserved Ribbing

Foursquare founder Dennis Crowley took a lot of ribbing yesterday for a comment he made to a blogger at an NYU panel discussion. The panel was called “The Case for Media Optimism,” and Crowley stated that he thought referral fees would be the next big thing in social media marketing.

For example, if someone Tweets about a new movie and 500 of his friends follow a link to buy a ticket for the movie, then the original referrer gets a kickback for each ticket. When asked if Foursquare was working on this idea, Crowley said it was on a long list of ideas under consideration.

Here’s where it gets sticky. Jeff Bercovici from Forbes.com asked Crowley how he would get around the FTC ruling that required full disclosure when an endorsement was offered on social media in return for payment of some kind (cash, product or service.)

Bercovici writes:

Crowley was surprised. He hadn’t known that was the case, he said. He made a note to bring up the issue with Foursquare’s legal team, and thanked me for alerting him to a potential complication that could influence their decision about whether to move forward.

Gawker and other outlets picked up on the statement and replied with jeering remarks about Crowley’s intelligence and his ability to run a major company.

But the truth is, the FTC ruling may not apply in Foursquare’s case. Here’s the important section from the FTC’s “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

The Commission does not believe that all uses of new consumer-generated media to discuss product attributes or consumer experiences should be deemed “endorsements” within the meaning of the Guides.

Rather, in analyzing statements made via these new media, the fundamental question is whether, viewed objectively, the relationship between the advertiser and the speaker is such that the speaker’s statement can be considered “sponsored” by the advertiser and therefore an “advertising message.”

In other words, in disseminating positive statements about a product or service, is the speaker: (1) acting solely independently, in which case there is no endorsement, or (2) acting on behalf of the advertiser or its agent, such that the speaker’s statement is an “endorsement” that is part of an overall marketing campaign?

The way I read that, a person who decides to talk about a movie to their friends, then after the fact, gets a $15 Fandango gift certificate as a thank you, doesn’t constitute an endorsement and thus isn’t covered by the rule.

If Foursquare says to a member, we’ll give you a Fandango gift certificate if you checkin from your local theater and give a glowing report of the movie — that’s an endorsement and has to have a disclaimer.

Offering social media kickbacks for positive results is not a contract between the company and the user. It’s not a paid endorsement. Giving me a DVD for free in return for a review on my blog, is an endorsement.

Related Articles

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Internet Marketing News Dies Slow Death In Q4

According to various sources (trust us they are real people) the report of the death of any interesting news in the Internet marketing space is real. Apparently there is nothing that is really happening in the industry, just a lot of yammering on about things that effect about 1,000 people in total, on average.

The resulting dearth in real news has led to an increase in stupid post titles that are designed to garner links and add no real value to anyone at any time. What these posts do accomplish though is they clutter up Twitter and provide the opportunity for other people in the industry to blindly retweet anything because “that’s what you are supposed to do”.

While there is some hope that real Internet marketing news may not actually be dead, but just ‘playing possum’, many industry observers are preparing an impromptu Twitter memorial service for this sudden demise of a once dear friend.

Critics claim that there are about 2 – 3 bits of actual news in the search and social media space that find their way out into the wild during any given week but they struggle for air amidst the ridiculous glad-handing and back-slapping that has taken the place of actually getting any work done.

We will keep an eye on any developments here at Marketing Pilgrim but there is great concern that maybe there is nothing left to say.

Goodbye dear friend.

Please be sure to retweet and share this with your ‘friends’! :-)

Related Articles

Walmart Does Groupon Without Groupon

They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but I’m not sure Groupon felt the love when they saw Walmart’s new marketing plan on Facebook.

They call it the “CrowdSaver,” and guess how it works. When a deal reaches a certain customer threshold, the deal is unlocked and everyone gets to buy in for a discounted price. The only difference between Walmart’s CrowdSaver and Groupon (and it’s a big one) is the upfront money.

When you choose a deal on Groupon, you’re committed to buy provided that the deal hits the threshold. (I’ve always wondered what percentage of deals never hit the mark. . .. ) Walmart isn’t looking for your credit card info or a purchase promise. All you have to do to join the deal on their Facebook page is “like” the deal.

Big deal. With no commitment, sure people are going to click, why not? What is Walmart gaining here?

A headache, if you ask me. Here’s why. The current deal, a Plasma TV for a measly 18% off has reached its 5000 “likes” threshold. The deal is now active — only, it’s not. If you click through on the buy button, you’ll be charged the full price. If you look at the comments, people are doing this and they’re frustrated. You have to read the whole ad to see that the price won’t actually go into effect until “later this week.” Meaning, if you want it, you have to keep hitting Walmart’s Facebook page to check.

From Walmart’s POV, I can see the power here. They’ve created a scenario that appears to be time sensitive and plays into the “part of the group” mentality. For the consumer, this is nothing but smoke and mirrors. The deal isn’t much of a deal at all and the promise of unlocking it when it hits a benchmark is lie. It’s just another TV on sale this weekend at Walmart. But the clever marketing folks have made 5,000 people believe that they made it happen.

Once the novelty wears off, I’m betting CrowdSaver will have a short shelf-life.

What do you think of Walmart’s CrowdSaver program? A clever marketing ploy or a poor imitation of the real thing?

Related Articles

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Web 2 Debrief for Media, Marketing Mavens: Please Join Us!

web2db.pngReaders of Searchblog already know that Web 2 is coming in less than three weeks, what with all my missives here about Schmidt, Zuckerberg, Bartz, and others. But what I haven't told you about is the "Web2 Debrief" that my company, Federated Media, is doing after the conference.

The Debrief is an evening event directly after the last day of the show, featuring Tim O'Reilly and myself in conversation about the previous three days. We'll be breaking down the highlights of the event and taking questions from the audience. There will be a distinct focus on what it all means from the point of view of the marketing and/or media business, given FM's position in those industries.

The nominal ($35) fee helps to cover the food and drink, as well as the excellent venue - Mezzanine, a short walk from the Palace Hotel, where Web 2 Summit will be held. I hope to see you there!

Click here to register for the Web2 Debrief.

Also, don't forget that today is our "Points of Control" webcast, where Tim and I will discuss the theme of this year's Web 2 Summit. Registration is free.

Related Articles

Does Your Site Hold Up to the Window Shopping Test?

image of red rain boots

Window shopping can be a disillusioning experience. A beautiful display can pull you in, only to lead to a shop with a bad selection and lousy customer service. Which makes it less fun to pop back onto the street to continue the search.

Online businesses have window displays too — or at least a good counterpart. If you’re doing business online, you may be surprised to know that your window display could be making promises that your store doesn’t deliver on.

Follow along with me and my daughter as we shop for new rain boots, and you’ll discover what works and what doesn’t when you’re creating an online “window display” to entice your customers to buy.

We were looking for the same things most people do when they shop: good selection, quality products, an enjoyable shopping experience, excellent customer service, and a price point we could afford.

Lots of window displays seemed to promise those things. Like that one over there. Are those the boots we’re looking for?

We ventured into the store.

Store 1: Anybody home?

As our eyes adjusted to the store, we noticed it was dark and a little hard to make out what they were selling. The place seemed abandoned, and no one came forward to help us. We had seen a pair of boots in the window, but now that we were inside, we weren’t sure they even carried boots.

They had shoes, but there was no order to how they were presented. They didn’t seem to be organized by men’s and women’s shoes. They weren’t displayed by size or style. They were just placed around the store randomly, and there was nobody around to help us find what we were looking for.

We backed away and kept looking.

Store 2: Accosted by a hustler

A few steps beyond the first store, we saw another window display. The window display was full of light, and the boots were organized by men’s and women’s styles. It was easy to see they had plenty of inventory.

We headed inside.

This store looked much better at first glance. But the loud music playing in the background was really hard to take. The store’s walls were painted with florescent colors. It was distracting, and hard to focus.

A salesperson approached. He strained to speak over the music, and loudly asked what we were looking for.

We said we were looking for rain boots, and he steered us over to a display of leather boots with 5” stiletto heels. He tried to convince me that these boots would hold up great in the rain, and besides that, my daughter’s legs would look longer.

I noticed the boots were $485.00, and wondered if that had something to do with his recommendation.

I pretended to need to make an urgent phone call, and we hustled out in a hurry.

Store 3: Our luck turns

At this point, we were a little frustrated. The first two stores we visited had made a promise with their window displays. We went inside expecting to find what caught our eyes in the window. Once inside, though, the shopping experience fell apart.

We were getting a little tired at this point, but we kept going, hoping to see another display that caught our attention. And this time, we finally got lucky.

The window display looked organized and appealing. The boots were grouped together, divided into men’s and women’s styles, and organized by color.

A spacious, soothing atmosphere greeted us when we walked inside. There was plenty of room to wander the aisles and look at products more closely. We scanned the merchandise and found the boots section right away.

As we moved to that part of the store, a salesperson appeared. He let us know that all their boots were marked down 50% this week, and that he could help us find what we were looking for. We started to feel lucky we picked this week to wander into this particular store looking for boots.

We found the style she liked, but they didn’t have them in red. My daughter had her heart set on red rain boots.

We asked the salesperson what we could do, and he had a great answer for us. They could special order the boots in her size, in red. They would deliver them at no charge, and she would have them the next day.

We happily handed over the credit card. Victory!

Which store is yours?

If you think this is a lesson in e-commerce sites like eToys or Zappo’s, think again.

Every site gives its readers an experience. And it’s up to you to make sure your site, particularly your homepage, delivers what they want.

When people arrive at your site’s homepage, which of these stores reflects their experience? Is it uninviting and disorganized? Is it bright, loud, and not terribly helpful?

Or does it make your offerings easy to skim, and enticing to sign up for or purchase? Do you have help systems like FAQ pages and contact forms to make it simple for your customer to get their questions answered?

Have you made it easy to find great content that gives them exactly what they’re looking for? Is everything on the page geared to making sure they find just what they want?

Do you track what your customer is looking for so that you can be sure you’re displaying what they’re in the market to purchase?

Your home page makes a promise, just like a window display does. If it’s set up right, customers will click to enter and find out more.

Once they’ve found you, will they buy your boots?

Related Articles

MySpace’s Full Rethink

If there is anyone out there who is truly interested, MySpace ( I want to put their new logo in here but I don’t know how to type it so it makes sense to a reader, which is a BRILLIANT marketing move by the way ;-) ) is getting ready to rollout a whole new look, feel, mission, mantra. You name it they’re doing it.

According to Bloomberg News

News Corp.’s MySpace is introducing a new website design with a focus on younger users in a drive to stem subscriber losses and distinguish itself from Facebook, the biggest social network.

Starting today, most U.S. users will be able to access the site’s most-popular music and videos, updated in real time. They can choose between homepage views and earn rewards for postings, according to Beverly Hills, California-based MySpace. The new version will be available worldwide by the end of November.

The strategy hinges on drawing 13-to-35-year-olds seeking an entertainment- centric social network separate from parents and other adults on Facebook, MySpace President Mike Jones said in an interview.

“This is a full rethink,” Jones said. “This is an entirely different product.”

I honestly don’t know what to say here. You have to respect the effort to get MySpace back into the view of social media practitioners and end users alike but does anyone have the time or the strength to add more social to their network?

Here are a couple of the more noteworthy changes:

-Three different ways or settings to view the site in ranging from ‘traditional’ to a montage / collage of messages, media etc that is updated constantly. Sounds like the ADHD sets answer to a stock ticker which must be the News Corp. influence in the project.

-Loyalty programs and labels / badges for those who demand to quench their insecurity through social media titles.

Probably more telling are the basic financials which start with the $580 million purchase of Facebook back in 2005 for about $580 million. From the Bloomberg article we see just how well this investment has worked out.

If the site doesn’t turn around, New York-based News Corp. will likely sell the business within two years, RBC Capital markets analyst David Bank said. MySpace is worth about $300 million, Alan Gould, an analyst with New York-based Evercore Partners Inc., said in an e-mail.

Whatever the end game, this whole effort and process seems to be putting good money after bad. With Facebook continuing to gain momentum and the landscape changing at a rapid pace it appears as if the likelihood of MySpace squeezing itself into the social media mix again (at least here in the US) is pretty slim.

Since I fall outside their target demo I guess I don’t even need to pay attention or care. Oh, I probably would do that anyway.

What about you?

Related Articles

Build Your Own URL Scraper and Scale Your CPV Campaigns Sky High

This is extremely well done guest post by Tijn of IMRat.com (Internet Marketing Rat). While not for the faint of heart, the technical detail here is extremely valuable if you're willing to take the time to intake and digest it all, even if that means coming back later to read it in chunks. So without further ado, check it out...

Don't you hate it when you spend days testing URLs for your new CPV or Google Display Network campaign, only to find that the profitable URLs give you just enough traffic and profit to have a couple of pints (as in beer)?

$20 a day in profit is nice, but it won't last long. Especially if you only have 2 or 3 profitable targets. You are destined to fail very quickly. As soon as another affiliate targets the same URLs you are doomed.

Some will urge you to move on and find another offer.

Not me.

Save that $100 you would have spend testing 10 new offers. Focus first on scaling and maximising the profits from the offer that you already know converts!

All you need to do is find a bunch of related URLs and test those.

But how? You don’t really want to spend hours checking a variety of websites, copy & pasting URLs. You could outsource this boring brain numbing task...

Nah! Follow my motto...

So in this post I will share with you one of the many ways in which I automate my CPV workflow.

You will learn how you can build your own automated URL scraper. The methods I share will save you hours of time! No more manual copying and pasting of results from the search engines.

The Tools

There are a number of websites that you will need to use to build your scraper. I suggest you register if you don’t have an account:

Yahoo Pipes
Dapper

The 8 Sources Of Related URL Data

Using the tools mentioned above, you will setup your scraper to get related URL data. Here are 8 sites I use to get related URLs and keywords to scale my campaigns.

Google - Similar Sites
Google Trends - Sites Also Visited
Alexa - Top 5 High Impact Search Queries, Related Links, and Clickstream
iSpionage - SEO Competitors
Google Ad Planner - Sites Also Visited
Compete - Destinations
Compete - Top 5 Referrer Keywords
Open Site Explorer - High authority backlinks

And yes - I use these, as well as a bunch of other hush hush techniques in my own private scraper. I am not gonna walk you through scraping each of these, that would be too easy.

I’ll show you how to do 3. You can figure out the others for yourself. After all, the aim here is for you to learn something....right? ;)

How will the URL scraper work?

Using free online applications, tied together with some secret sauce, the tool will take a profitable URL as input, and spit out a bunch of other URLs for you to test in your CPV or Google Display Network campaign.

For this tutorial, the URLs will come from 3 sources:

● Google Related Sites
● Google Trends
● High Page Rank Backlink URLs

Then, all you need to do is add the new URL targets to your campaign, and see which ones convert. Take the URLs that are converting, and rinse and repeat.

So lets get started with Stage 1, setting up Yahoo Pipes.

Stage 1: Create Your Master Yahoo Pipe

Yahoo Pipes is the control centre for your scraper. The reason for this is that it’s got loads of modules for you to manipulate, clean and extract data.

At the moment Yahoo is still using the V1 Engine as the default, and this tutorial is focused on that version. They are working on Version 2 and you can if you want test your pipes in the V2 engine, but this is still in beta.

Check out one of my earlier posts about scraping google hot trends with yahoo pipes for an introduction.

Once you have checked out the post above, go over to Yahoo Pipes, register/login, and click the Create A Pipe link.

This will take you to the main editor screen. Before you start editing, you should name your pipe by clicking the ‘Untitled’ tab in the top right hand corner, enter a name for your pipe. Then click OK and click the save button on the top-right of the screen.

If you want you can also use the ‘Properties’ button to enter the title, a description and a bunch of tags to help you locate your pipes easier in future.

Stage 2: Add the URL Input Module

Next, you are going to create the module for inputting the URL you want to expand.

For this you just drag the User inputs > URL Input module into the Pipe Editor. Enter the name and prompt, and make sure you enter 1 in the Position field. When building pipes I also add default and debug info to help with testing modules.

For this tutorial I focus on a scraper that is primarily targeted at expanding domains, not URLs for specific pages. Don't worry though, you can use most of the techniques I share on page urls as well.

Therefore as a next step, you want to make sure that the domain is extracted from whatever URL is input. This is done with a simple String > String Regex module which takes the URL string and uses a regex code to extract the domain.

Make sure that the output from the URL input module is connected to the input of this new module, and enter the fields as they are shown below:

Stage 3: Get Google Similar Sites

For this first bunch of URLs you will use a feature from google which allows you to identify sites that are similar to a particular URL.

Unfortunately, because Google use the robot.txt file to block some scrapers, you won't be able to use Yahoo Pipes.

No problem though, because the excellent Dapper comes to the rescue. For an introduction to Dapper, watch this video. Dapper is basically a simplified version of the Fetch Page module in Yahoo Pipes.

Setup your Dapper

If you are not familiar with how to use Dapper to scrape data from Google, I suggest you read my blogpost about Scraping Google Instant.

Go over to open.dapper.net, and create your google dapper, and set it up for the following search query:

related:jonathanvolk.com

You can, if you want to return more than 10 results per query, add the following to the google url:

&num=100

Once your done with your Dapp and got it setup, you need to get the dapp URL. Just click the XML button:

And enter a dummy URL in the URL field (in the image below I entered http://jonathanvolk.com):

Click the Update Input button and copy the URL starting with http://open.dapper.net/RunDapp... into your notebook because you will need that URL in the next step.

Build the URL in Yahoo Pipes

Switch back to your Yahoo Pipes browser window and drag a URL > URL Builder module into the editor. Then paste the Dapper XML Url from the previous step into the field next to the label ‘Base:’ and press the key. This should split the URL and populate the Query Parameters as shown in the screenshot below.

Connect the output from the String Regex module in Step 2 with the input to the right of the variable input field for v_url as shown above. This will bascially add the domain to the v_url variable and pass this to the Dapp you created just now.

To make sure that the URL is correct, click on the title bar so that the module box is highlighted in orange. Then click on the refresh link in the bottom left hand corner (the debug part of the screen with the gray background).

If everything has been connected and setup correctly you should see the URL as per the above screenshot.

Load the XML Dapper Data

Now that you have got the URL setup to your created Dapp, all you need to do is setup a Get Data module which will load the xml data from the URL.

So drag a Sources > Fetch Data module onto the Pipe Editor and connect the output from the URL Builder module in the previous step to the URL field input of this new module as shown below:

In the Path to item list you want to enter url, or whatever other name you assigned to the Dapp variable.

Again to test make sure the module is selected and click the refresh link at the bottom of the page. This should output a list of items numbered 0 to 7, and if you expand an item, it should look like the following:

Because this contains an amount of data you are not interested in, you just need to add the Operators > Sub-element module to strip out any data you dont need.

Link this with the output from the previous module and you are done and can move on to the next stage.

Stage 4: Google Website Trends

Next up, the 2nd source of related URLs: Google Website Trends site & the list of “Also visited” sites.

Here you are just going to use the Also visited site URL’s. If your looking for ways to expand your scraper, you could use the list of ‘also searched for’ keywords and plug them into a google serp scraper.

To scrape these URLs you can use Yahoo Pipes. For some reason this is not blocked by Google.

Like with previous examples, you create a URL Builder module, and pipe that into a Fetch page module. The fetch page module is then used to cut out the relevant html and break it up into a list of items, one for each URL.

To start, view the webpage source and search for “Also visited” to identify the relevant section:

You also need to know where the URL list ends, so scroll down the Source until you get to the point where you can see the heading “Also searched for”:

For this one I’m not walking you through the step by step. Just use what you learned in stage 1 above and my post about scraping google hot trends with yahoo pipes.

Create another URL Builder module, and copy the full URL of the Google Trends search into the URL field. When you press Tab it should automatically populate the different fields. Then you connect the String Regex module from Step 1 to the string input for the ‘q’ field.

Next create your Fetch Page module and attach the URL Builder pipe to this new module. Then, with a bit of trial and error, enter the relevant HTML code to cut out & separate the html for the links. Don't worry about being too precise, because you will setup a ‘search & replace’ module to remove any unnecessary data.

When you're done with this step, your Master pipe should look something like this:

This module will basically give you a list of items with html code for each URL. Because we really just need the root domain for each of the sites, you will need to clean up each item using a Regex module. The bit you want to extract is underlined in Red.

The tool of choice for this is the Operator > Regex module which uses Regular Expressions to search & replace for sections that we don't need in each item.

Again, using my favourite trial and error method, setup the regex rules so that at the end you have only the domain left as content. Rather than doing this all in Yahoo Pipes, I use the online RegEx tool with the relevant html copied into the content section to sort out my Regex rules.

Note that you will need to check each item to make sure your rules work for each item and extract the domain correctly.

Next, the final source of related URLs - Top backlinks!

Stage 5: Top Backlinks Through Open Site Explorer

One of my strategies for scaling profitable URLs is to look where the traffic to that URL is coming from. There are many different sources of traffic, and here you are after the websites that linkto the URL you want to scale.

Open Site Explorer is a great tool to capture these backlinks:

● The index of backlinks is as good as Yahoo Site explorer
● It offers API and CSV access to the data (makes scraping easier)
● It ranks sites by Page & Domain authority - ie most important backlinks first

This final part of the URL scraper uses again the URL builder module, but instead of the Fetch Page module you will need to add the Fetch CSV module and use the CSV link (highlighted on the screenshot above):

http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/www.jonathanvolk.com/a!links!!f!all!!format!csv!!s!external!!t!page

Because this is not a standard formatted URL, you need to manually paste the relevant sections in the URL builder fields. You can create additional Path elements by clicking the + sign:

Base: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org
1st Path Element: the query URL, ie www.jonathanvolk.com
2nd Page Element: a!links!!f!all!!format!csv!!s!external!!t!page

Next you will need to make sure the URL you want to scale is passed to the new URL builder module. Before you connect it however, there is a small problem.

In this particular case, Open Site Explorer does not cope with URLs formatted like this: http://jonathanvolk.com. You therefore need to make sure that the input URL is reformatted and that the http:// is stripped from the URL.

Just use a String Replace module and replace the first occurrence of http:// with nothing.

Next create the Fetch CSV module and connect it to the URL builder as shown below:

To configure the Fetch CSV module correctly, I recommend you download the actual CSV file and open it in Excel or similar spreadsheet program.

That way you can easily identify the number of rows that need to be skipped before the data starts, and name each of the columns as I have done above.

For this particular scraper you are only interested in the target URL, so like with the Google Serp scraper step above, you need to remove all other data:

Thats the final one done.

Next you will combine all data sources together and clean up the URLs.

Stage 6: Tidy up your URL list

Before I walk you through how to finalise & use your URL scraper, a quick overview of what we have covered so far.

Based on an input URL your CPV Campaign Scaler creates 3 lists of related URLs:

1. Google SERPs - Related Sites
2. Google Trends - Sites Users Also Visited
3. Open Site Explorer Backlinks

These lists now need to be combined, cleaned up, and you want to remove duplicates.

To combine different Item lists, just add an Operator > Union module and connect the outputs for each of the final modules on the 3 data sources to the Union module:

By clicking on the union module you should now have a single list of items showing in the Debugger window. The total of this list of items should equal the sum of the output from the 3 data sources.

You might have noticed that not all URLs are formatted in the same way. Before you can remove duplicates you therefore need to ensure all URLs are formatted in the right way. Because this is for scaling PPV campaigns, the format you will use is domain.com/path/page.ext.

So again, add an Operator > Regex module and configure it to remove unnecessary content from each item:

● Remove http:// from the start of any URLs
● Remove trailing / from the end of any URLs

See the screenshot below for the RegEx rules you need for this.

Finally, lets remove duplicate URLs. Just connect a Operator > Unique module to the RegEx ouput and configure it to filter based on item.content:

In this particular example 221 URLs were reduced to 218, so there were only 3 duplicates.

Save your module again, and in the next and final stage you will get your Yahoo Pipe ready to publish the URLs and extract it as a CSV file so you can easily copy and paste the URLs into your Traffic source of choice.

Stage 7: Launch your scraper

To be able to export your yahoo pipe as a CSV file, you will need to add & rename a couple of fields:

● Change the item.content field to item.title
● Add a y:id field

This is straight forward, but not very well documented on Yahoo Pipes.

Add a Operator > Rename module and connect the Output from the Unique module above to the input of this Rename module. All you need is 2 rename rules:

Before you save and run your pipe, you need to connect the output from the Rename module to the Pipe Output module.

This module is always included on your pipe so you wont need to add it.

However, because the pipe is rather complex and large, you might have trouble locating the Pipe Output. If this is the case, just click the “layout” button in the top left corner of the screen, and scroll to the top right hand corner of your pipe layout window.

You will need to drag and drop the Pipe Output module several times until your at the bottom of the Pipe Layout before you can connect the output from the Rename module to the input of the Pipe Output module.

Now hit the Save button at the top of the screen, and then click Run Pipe.

This will open a new Tab/Window and start to run the Pipe. Once its completed running, you should see something like this:

To get the CSV file, you need to copy the URL from the “Get as RSS” button. Just rightclick the button and click “Copy link address” or “Open in New Window” in Google Chrome or something similar in other browsers.

You should have a URL that looks something like this:

Then just change the _render setting to CSV and open the URL in your browser. This should popup a “Save file as...” window. Before you save change the filename to something like jonathanvolk.csv.

And thats it.

Click on the image below to open up the full yahoo pipe.

Now there are many ways in which you can build on this:

● Add data sources
● Scrape Alexa rank Open Site Explorer Page Authority to sort your list to get the most important ones on top
● Include URL variations (ie domain.com/ domaincom .domain.com)

If you liked this tutorial or have any questions, drop me a comment below. If you want more then check out my blog imrat.com & subscribe to my twitter feed.

Related Articles